Related Content
Tagged with
Great records in the hands of a great DJ can take on greater significance but I fear that this is becoming forgotten and the kind of skill exhibited By Dan that afternoon will one day be a lost art.
The effect of today's technical milieu and the ceaseless tech-evangelism of one or two of our most prominent DJs seems to be that younger DJs are being encouraged to use new tools to re-edit, loop, chop and combine music to conform to their own personal view of how music should be and to make it their own.
In many ways, this is a very positive development. It will surely bring us new sounds, new ideas and ultimately be of benefit. I'm all in favour of progress, when it is indeed progress.
Should we see music as a linear or non-linear artform?
It is significant that Dan was using only vinyl but his set raised questions for me that go beyond the usual arguments about vinyl versus other formats. Such arguments often stress the convenience of digital systems for the traveling DJ, ease of distribution, ease of promotion, universal access to huge catalogues of music, lower barriers to market entry, so on and so forth. Today I have other concerns.
My first question is question is: "Should we see music as a linear or non linear artform?". My second question is, "If we regard music as non-linear, how does this affect the relationship between musician and DJ?"
Music is unquestionably temporal. It is experienced "in time". The way in which a certain piece of music changes over time is one of the things which gives it its character. Some music changes a lot over time, some changes very little. The important thing to remember is that the rate of change and degree of change have traditionally been within the control of the composer.
However, thanks to technological developments, music has for some time now had the potential to be regarded as non-linear. A DJ can decide at will to deconstruct and reconstruct any piece of music in real time. Of course, there is something tremendously exciting about it but this development also raises issues of authority, experience and skill.
When musicians work, they may call upon a repertoire of skills acquired through years of study, experiment, sacrifice and experience in order to develop structure and narrative in their music. They construct their works to be dynamic yet coherent and, thereby, hope to produce work which has meaning and has lasting personal and cultural value. These are good reasons to respect the linearity of what musicians produce.
In the current moment, DJs are being encouraged to see music as non-linear. When a DJ plays music chopped into loops he restricts himself to adding dynamics exclusively through a set of techniques which, although perhaps effective, are necessarily limited to his own experience.
The set can become homogeneous, lack vibrancy, and be a listening experience that's far from ideal. Playing music in this way ignores the wealth of experience musicians have in providing structured work, it ignores the original intentions of the musician and by reducing tracks to loops, DJs ignore the rich variety of compositional and structural approaches taken by disparate musicians which could give their sets an energy and dynamic they currently lack.
Aye, excellent stuff. Really well written too.
Great article alright, he's spot on too!
nice article!
Great read.
Great points made, I for one am currently spending a fortune on vinyl having just got my first set of decks... about 20 years late!
Utter tosh, MP3's sound way better than vinyl!


RSS
Comments
Sorry, but due to spam we have had to disable guest commenting.
We're working to protect comments from spam and return guest commenting.
In the meantime, please register or login to post comments.
Superb read there, a few really interesting and stimulating questions!